sovietwarplanes.com
March 29, 2017, 11:06:57 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: The site's front page has been updated!
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Yak-9D White "22" - 3rd Squadron 6 giap of Black Sea Fleet  (Read 1110 times)
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1047

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« on: August 29, 2014, 04:33:05 AM »

Hi,
here is colorized photo of M. Grib's Yak-9D over Sevastopol in 1944.
On the one Czech forum I was recommended to consider a bit more "artistic" look to that image - to make some frame, text, etc.
So here we go (EDIT 16-Sep-2014):



Whole discussion with source photo is at http://sovietwarplanes.com/board/index.php?topic=1840.0
And another photos of this unit are at http://sovietwarplanes.com/board/index.php?topic=1869.msg15426#new

Regards,
   66misos

 
« Last Edit: September 16, 2014, 07:59:17 AM by 66misos » Logged

Massimo Tessitori
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4696


« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2014, 05:23:01 AM »

Hi Misos,
very good-looking work. I hope to see many other ones.
Regards
Massimo
Logged
KL
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1663


« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2014, 10:54:55 AM »

Hi Misos,
very good!  The only thing that I don't understand is the meaning of the phrase "modified NKAP scheme" - what is modified there?  It looks standard to me...  what would be in your opinion, more standard scheme?  consider that NKAP instruction included poorly printed, post stamp size, simplified sketch...

It's about the basic question:  were there standards or not?  Pilawskii and many others say that there were no standards (NKAP supposedly issued "recommendations" only, planes were painted with whatever was available, etc.).  I am one of those who believe that there were standards, orders, that planes were painted with aviation paints only etc.  So, I see that word "modified" as indication that the plane wasn't painted according to the NKAP directive.

BTW, plural of aircraft is aircraft - not aircrafts (no "s" at the end)...  Smiley

KL
Logged
66misos
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1047

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.


WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2014, 12:54:22 AM »

Hi KL,
thanks for comment.
I hope you don't mind when I reply you and continue with the discussion in the Yak-9D Work in Progress thread at http://sovietwarplanes.com/board/index.php?topic=1840.msg15335#msg15335
Plus, another interesting comments will come from airforce.ru forum.
Here in Galery I would like to have only one, final picture.

Regards,
    66misos
Logged

xan
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 439



WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2014, 08:42:01 AM »

Hi Misos ,
a really great job!!!
I have a lot of normandie-niemen pics tu submit you  Wink
Xan
Logged

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!